Comments on: Tiger Hates Leopard http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard.html Big, Honkin' Systems Stuff Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:19:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: systemsboy http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard.html/comment-page-1#comment-842 systemsboy Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:51:00 +0000 http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard/#comment-842 That seems like an astoundingly bad reason to upgrade to Leopard Server.<br/><br/>Grr...<br/><br/>-systemsboy That seems like an astoundingly bad reason to upgrade to Leopard Server.

Grr…

-systemsboy

]]> By: Nigel Kersten http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard.html/comment-page-1#comment-841 Nigel Kersten Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:35:00 +0000 http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard/#comment-841 Apple changed the swupd catalog format in 10.5, ostensibly to serve the new catalog of Windows updates for Apple Software Update under Windows.<br/><br/>The problem is that there appears to be no officially sanctioned way to configure Apple Software Update under Windows to look at a swupd server.<br/><br/>awesome :)<br/><br/>nigel kersten Apple changed the swupd catalog format in 10.5, ostensibly to serve the new catalog of Windows updates for Apple Software Update under Windows.

The problem is that there appears to be no officially sanctioned way to configure Apple Software Update under Windows to look at a swupd server.

awesome :)

nigel kersten

]]> By: systemsboy http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard.html/comment-page-1#comment-840 systemsboy Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:27:00 +0000 http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard/#comment-840 Well, I was surprised. At least by the fact that 10.4 Server can't serve 10.5 updates. There may be some technical reason for this, but I doubt it. The only reason I can see to pull a stunt like that is to force people to upgrade their servers to maintain the same level of functionality. That seems like a crummy way to treat their Admin customers. And that isn't usually Apple's style.<br/><br/>-systemsboy Well, I was surprised. At least by the fact that 10.4 Server can’t serve 10.5 updates. There may be some technical reason for this, but I doubt it. The only reason I can see to pull a stunt like that is to force people to upgrade their servers to maintain the same level of functionality. That seems like a crummy way to treat their Admin customers. And that isn’t usually Apple’s style.

-systemsboy

]]> By: Anonymous http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard.html/comment-page-1#comment-839 Anonymous Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:10:00 +0000 http://systemsboy.com/2008/02/tiger-hates-leopard/#comment-839 That isnt' surprising. I ran into this awhile back, once I realized that my 10.4 SU Server couldn't serve updates to my 10.5 boxes. I figured 10.5 would be able to serve 10.4 clients. That isnt’ surprising. I ran into this awhile back, once I realized that my 10.4 SU Server couldn’t serve updates to my 10.5 boxes. I figured 10.5 would be able to serve 10.4 clients.

]]>