<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Adventures of Systems Boy! &#187; 2006 &#187; February</title>
	<atom:link href="http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://systemsboy.com</link>
	<description>Big, Honkin' Systems Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 02:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When the Cure is Worse than the Disease: Mac Anti-Virus Software</title>
		<link>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/when-the-cure-is-worse-than-the-disease-mac-anti-virus-software.html</link>
		<comments>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/when-the-cure-is-worse-than-the-disease-mac-anti-virus-software.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>systemsboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/when-the-cure-is-worse-than-the-disease-mac-anti-virus-software/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting anti-virus software for the Mac is like getting chemotherapy for a cold. It&#8217;s totally overkill and does way more harm than good. You&#8217;re better off with the cold. Via MacFixIt:In yet another case of AntiVirus software causing serious issues while purporting to be identifying infected files, it appears that Sophos&#8217; AntiVirus software is generating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting anti-virus software for the Mac is like getting chemotherapy for a cold. It&#8217;s totally overkill and does way more harm than good. You&#8217;re better off with the cold.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><br />
<blockquote><span style="font-weight: bold;">Via <a href="http://www.macfixit.com/">MacFixIt</a>:</span><br />In yet another case of AntiVirus software causing serious issues while purporting to be identifying infected files, it appears that Sophos&#8217; AntiVirus software is generating false positives for the &#8220;OSX/Inqtana.B worm&#8221;, invoking users to delete critical application and system files and causing serious issues.</p>
<p>Again, the virus being identified by Sophos AntiVirus is marked Inqtana.B &#8212; apparently a variant of the Inqtana.A malware that likewise spreads by copying itself to other computers via a bluetooth connection.</p>
<p>As previously reported, OSX/Inqtana.A &#8212; a Java based proof of concept bluetooth worm that affects older versions of Mac OS X 10.4.x (Tiger). The vulnerability does not affect Mac OS X 10.4.5, and has not been found in the wild.</p>
<p>Despite that, Sophos&#8217; software is identifying &#8220;infected&#8221; files &#8212; sometimes numbering in the thousands &#8212; on Mac OS X 10.4.5 systems.</p>
<p>The results of the false positives are, in some cases, disastrous&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;We currently recommend that users disable Sophos AntiVirus until further notice, and disallow the application to automatically delete any files it deems &#8220;infected.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That really says it all. The state of commercial Mac anti-virus software is pathetic. It seems like the developers of this software are desperately trying to drum up business with scare tactics for viruses that don&#8217;t even exist in the wild while simultaneously writing code that damages people&#8217;s systems. Fucked up? You betcha.</p>
<p><a href="http://systemsboy.com/2005/09/why-we-need-anti-virus-software-for.html">I&#8217;m all for virus protection, even on the Mac</a>. But when anti-virus software is worse than the viruses it claims to protect against, it&#8217;s no wonder no one&#8217;s buying it.<span style="font-size:85%;"><br /><a href="http://del.icio.us/systemsboy/Rants"> </a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/when-the-cure-is-worse-than-the-disease-mac-anti-virus-software.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scripts Part 4: Cloning — What&#8217;s the Big Deal?</title>
		<link>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-4-cloning-%e2%80%94-whats-the-big-deal.html</link>
		<comments>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-4-cloning-%e2%80%94-whats-the-big-deal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 08:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>systemsboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScriptSharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-4-cloning-%e2%80%94-whats-the-big-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boy, there sure are a lot of cloning apps out there. The mother of them all, of course, is Mike Bombich&#8217;s Carbon Copy Cloner, but it&#8217;s slowly losing mindshare to more aggressively marketed apps like the affable SuperDuper!. There are others, but I don&#8217;t feel like scouring the web for them, nor do I feel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, there sure are a lot of cloning apps out there. The mother of them all, of course, is <a href="http://www.bombich.com/">Mike Bombich&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html">Carbon Copy Cloner</a>, but it&#8217;s slowly losing mindshare to more aggressively marketed apps like the affable <a href="http://www.shirt-pocket.com/SuperDuper/SuperDuperDescription.html">SuperDuper!</a>. There are others, but I don&#8217;t feel like scouring the web for them, nor do I feel like going to the effort of linking to them all. Suffice to say, there are plenty. Just search <a href="http://www.versiontracker.com/">VersionTracker</a> and you&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>I find the recent upswing in cloning utilities strange. Apple&#8217;s bundled Disk Utility application has actually <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20031030154346917">harbored the ability to clone</a> a system disk for some time now (I believe as far back as Panther). And yet, it seems the easier cloning gets, the more apps there are with which to do it. And charge you for it.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s script uses a handy command-line utility that&#8217;s actually been around since the Classic Mac OS days (though not, obviously, in command-line form): <span style="font-family:courier new;">asr</span>, which stands for Apple Software Restore. The <span style="font-family:courier new;">asr</span> command is essentially a command for cloning disks. In fact, that&#8217;s exactly what it is. When Mac OS X first came out, <span style="font-family:courier new;">asr</span> was not bundled. But in recent incarnations of the OS it&#8217;s hung around in the command-line, and it&#8217;s actually gotten quite refined and easy to use. Want to clone your boot drive? Here&#8217;s the command:</p>
<div style="border: 1px solid rgb(153, 153, 153); overflow: auto; width: 100%; height: auto;">
<pre><code><span style="font-size:85%;"><span style="font-family:courier new;">sudo asr -source [<span style="font-style: italic;">source_volume</span> ] -target [<span style="font-style: italic;">target_volume</span> ]</span></span></code></pre>
</div>
<p>That&#8217;s it. I can&#8217;t imagine an easier command structure. In a way, it&#8217;s almost easier to use than GUI apps that do the same thing. Of course you can get into some very complicated uses of <span style="font-family:courier new;">asr</span>, but for basic disk-to-disk cloning it&#8217;s drop-dead simple.</p>
<p>Now there is one little, tiny bump in this road. Tiger, you see, has a brand spanking new way of making certain files on your boot drive invisible. You know, files like <span style="font-family:courier new;">var</span> and <span style="font-family:courier new;">etc</span> and <span style="font-family:courier new;">private</span>. And Tiger&#8217;s version of <span style="font-family:courier new;">asr</span> (as well as Tiger&#8217;s Disk Utility program) are none the wiser. So, if you want things set up properly, you need to explicitly set the visibility of these files. There are a few ways to do this. Today&#8217;s script will use a utility called <span style="font-family:courier new;">SetHidden</span>, which comes on the Tiger install disc (a la this <a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301677">Apple KB article</a>). Just so you know.</p>
<p>So here it is. A very simple script for making an exact clone of a volume to another volume. Please keep in mind, because of the file visibility issue, this script MUST be run from the disc image, or it will not work properly. Also keep in mind that cloning will overwrite, replace or even erase the target drive. I am in no way responsible for any damage you incur to your system with this script. If you don&#8217;t feel comfortable using it, please don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>That said, here&#8217;s your free cloning utility.</p>
<p><a href="http://systemsboy.com/archive/ASRClone.dmg.zip">Download ASRClone</a><span style="font-size:85%;"><br /><a href="http://del.icio.us/systemsboy/Scripts"> </a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-4-cloning-%e2%80%94-whats-the-big-deal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delayed ACK Startup Item for Intel Macs</title>
		<link>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/delayed-ack-startup-item-for-intel-macs.html</link>
		<comments>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/delayed-ack-startup-item-for-intel-macs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>systemsboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScriptSharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/delayed-ack-startup-item-for-intel-macs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MacFixit just reported about troubles the new Intel-based Macs are having with network speeds, particularly AFP connections to, of all things, other Macs. The solution, they report, is to set the delayed_ack property to 0. In order for this change to survive a reboot, however, they recommend editing /etc/rc. The problem with this is that, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.macfixit.com/">MacFixit</a> just reported about <a href="http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=20060203081147368">troubles the new Intel-based Macs are having with network speeds</a>, particularly AFP connections to, of all things, other Macs. The solution, they report, is to set the <span style="font-family:courier new;">delayed_ack</span> property to <span style="font-family:courier new;">0</span>. In order for this change to survive a reboot, however, they recommend editing <span style="font-family:courier new;">/etc/rc</span>. The problem with this is that, often, edits made to <span style="font-family:courier new;">/etc/rc</span> will be overwritten by future updates to Mac OSX. In my experience, such modifications are better handled with a startup item, which is also a lot easier to add and remove. So I&#8217;ve suggested as much to the fine folks over at MacFixit, and I&#8217;ve even put my money where my mouth is. I&#8217;m offering to those who need it this delayedACK Startup Item, hand made by yours truly.</p>
<p>The linked disc image contains the delayedACK Startup Item, and also includes an installer and an uninstaller for the Startup Item.</p>
<p>Enjoy, you lucky Intel Mac owners (of which, alas, I am not one&#8230; Yet&#8230;)</p>
<p>UPDATE:<br />A reader called Nubo recently left this comment:<br />
<blockquote>&#8230;turning off delayed_ack is not necessarily something that should be left in the startup items forever. Having it on is normally beneficial or at least not severely degrading in normal environments. So this should be reviewed whenever Apple fixes the underlying problem in its implementation, or the actual root cause is found.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nubo is absolutely right. This startup item should be removed — either by running the included uninstaller or by simply dragging the startup item to the trash — once the problem has been resolved by Apple.</p>
<p>Thanks, Nubo, for pointing this out.</p>
<p><a href="http://systemsboy.com/archive/DelayedACKStartupItem.dmg">Download the Delayed ACK Startup Item</a><span style="font-size:85%;"><br /><a href="http://del.icio.us/systemsboy/Tiger"> </a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/delayed-ack-startup-item-for-intel-macs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mac OSX Deletes Open Documents</title>
		<link>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/mac-osx-deletes-open-documents.html</link>
		<comments>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/mac-osx-deletes-open-documents.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>systemsboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MacOSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/mac-osx-deletes-open-documents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astoundingly fucked up, yet true. I just got an email from a client who said she&#8217;d accidentally deleted a file she had open, and when she closed said document it was gone. I was all set to email her back saying that her file could not have been deleted if it was open, because the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astoundingly fucked up, yet true. I just got an email from a client who said she&#8217;d accidentally deleted a file she had open, and when she closed said document it was gone. I was all set to email her back saying that her file could not have been deleted if it was open, because the Mac OS won&#8217;t allow that sort of thing, but I thought I&#8217;d try it first, just to make sure I wasn&#8217;t talking out my ass (which is something you learn to do after many years in systems work — try stuff before you speak, that is, not talk out your ass, though that does come with the territory as well I suppose.)</p>
<p>So I tried it. I opened up DVD Studio Pro, created a new document, saved it to the Desktop, and then — with the document still open, mind you — I deleted it. Put it in the trash and deleted it. I received no warning message. And when I quit DVDSP, I was not prompted to re-save the document. It was gone, daddy, gone.</p>
<p>As astoundingly fucked up as this is, I do understand exactly why this happens. You see, active documents — that is, documents which are currently open — are stored in a temporary location, not, as one might suspect, where they are saved. The saved document and the open document are two separate files. Each application determines where the temporary storage location for open files will be. In the case of Final Cut docs, for example (and I know this from <a href="http://systemsboy.com/2005/09/tiger-lab-migration-part-8-home.html">cold, hard experience</a>), the temporary storage location is in a folder called .TemporaryItems on whatever drive is the active working drive. So, since the saved file and the active file are actually separate, it&#8217;s very possible to apparently delete a file that&#8217;s open in an application, because the file you&#8217;re deleting is not the open file you&#8217;re currently working on. It&#8217;s a saved version.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I mentioned that this is fucked up, but it really is. Astoundingly so.</p>
<p>In the same way that you can&#8217;t delete running processes, I think Apple really needs to make it equally impossible (or at least as difficult) to delete active files. The current paradigm just doesn&#8217;t make any kind of sense from where I sit.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">UPDATE:</span><br />A reader has pointed out in the comments that one application actually works the way you might expect. That application is Microsoft Word. A saved Word document and an open Word document are (apparently) one-and-the-same, and Word is able to keep track of open files even when they&#8217;re moved. If the fact that Word behaves more sensibly than most Apple applications isn&#8217;t an indication that this is something that needs fixin&#8217;, I&#8217;m not sure what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/mac-osx-deletes-open-documents.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scripts Part 3: Split and Rejoin Large Files</title>
		<link>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-3-split-and-rejoin-large-files.html</link>
		<comments>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-3-split-and-rejoin-large-files.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>systemsboy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ScriptSharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-3-split-and-rejoin-large-files/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two events have transpired to lead to the posting of this script: 1) I&#8217;ve been meaning to post a new script to the Scripts section of the blog for some time, and 2) MacOSXHints today had a hint about splitting and rejoining large files, and suggesting scripting this process. I just happen to have had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two events have transpired to lead to the posting of this script: 1) I&#8217;ve been meaning to post a new script to the Scripts section of the blog for some time, and 2) <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/">MacOSXHints</a> today had a <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20060125023540821">hint about splitting and rejoining large files</a>, and suggesting scripting this process. I just happen to have had such a script lying around for some time, so this seemed like an especially appropriate time to post it.</p>
<p>Essentially, this script is made to take large files and cut them into smaller (theoretically CD or DVD sized) pieces. The same script can then be used to rejoin these chunks. For splitting, the <span style="font-family:courier new;">script</span> uses the split command, and to rejoin files, it uses the <span style="font-family:courier new;">cat</span> command.</p>
<p>So here it is in all its glory.</p>
<p><a href="http://systemsboy.com/archive/SplitAndRejoinFiles.command.zip">SplitAndRejoinFiles Script</a><br /><a href="http://systemsboy.com/archive/SplitAndRejoinFiles.command">See the code</a><span style="font-size:85%;"><br /><a href="http://del.icio.us/systemsboy/Scripts"> </a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://systemsboy.com/2006/02/scripts-part-3-split-and-rejoin-large-files.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 374/434 objects using disk: basic

Served from: systemsboy.com @ 2012-05-18 08:40:04 -->
